Hannibal Lecter may be the most intriguing villain to appear on screen. There, I said it. But that statement should be nothing new. Lecter's wisdom and ability to read people along with a heart devoid of morals, makes him the kind of threat that's not only terrifying, but its monstrous -- it's simply impossible to concieve the sort of evil that Anthony Hopkins so gracefully depicts in Hannibal Lecter.
And then comes Hannibal Rising.
After seeing this latest cinematic installment of the Lecter saga, sadly, his persona has been cheapened. A character that was once hard to look in the eyes (even on screen), has been reduced to bad acting, corny dialogue, and a distracting facial scar.
The story of the film does shed a little insight onto early stages of the cannibalistic psychologist's life. Indeed, bits and pieces are interesting, but there's nothing in this film that can justify Lecter's unabated lack of emotion or value of human life -- perhaps its not possible to ever justify why he is the monster he is. It just would have been nice if director Peter Webber had tried a little harder to bring writer Thomas Harris' vision of budding cruelty to life.
The film begins with young Hannibal and his family, driven from their castle in war torn Eastern Europe. After witnessing his family's murder by allied air attacks, Hannibal and his sister Mischa are kidnapped by war profiteers, who eventually eat the younger Lecter. The remainder of the film is spent as a much older Hannibal (Gaspard Ulliel) seeks out his sister's murders. One by one he tracks them down and in the meantime, he has a subtle love affair with his widowed aunt and randomly learns the way of the Samurai. After already becoming a psychopathic killer, his breaking point supposedly comes when his aunt tells him there's nothing left in him to love. Call me crazy, but as soon as you find yourself eating human cheeks, you've fallen off your rocker long before.
While Ulliel tried his best to portray the young psychopath, he had some pretty big shoes to fill. Hopkins, one of the best actors of our time, portrays the cannibal to perfection, and as he created the visual persona of said villain, perhaps its unfair to compare the two. I did however find myself reminded of Stewie Griffin from time to time as Ulliel tried to make every thing he did look as sinister as possible. One scene in particular could have been subtitled, "Look at me... I'm so evil and I'm dialing the phone." Apparently, a sly smile and the slowing of all actions to the speed of a cooling lava flow translates to evil (and lucky for the audience, it was a rotary phone.)
The writing, while Thomas Harris can be credited with one of my favorite novels of all times (guess which one), wasn't much better. One liners and random actions seem to be attempts at justification for Lecter's killing patterns, but they simply don't play out. It's a huge leap, for example, that because Lecter was once told that the cheeks are the best part of the animal, that he would begin eating the flesh off human faces. These laughable lines and examples of foreshadowing smack with the mental image of Harris winking and saying, "See... That's why Lecter does that." It just doesn't work.
In the end, this film doesn't stand up to the other Lecter stories, but you can't (or shouldn't) really expect it to. The novel written much later than the original seems like the answer of a demanding fan base, wanting to know where the unquenchable evil that is Hannibal Lecter came from. Take away the captivating preconceptions of who this killer is, and you might have a good film on your hands, but that's simply not possible to do. Oh, and it would also need to be re-written, re-cast and re-shot.
Maybe that's too harsh, but all I'm saying is -- if you love Lecter, put in that DVD of Silence of the Lambs that you should already own, and enjoy him the way he's supposed to be enjoyed. I'm sure you could find something better to spend your ten bucks on.
----------
Josh Gloer, Movie Correspondent
You can find Josh's column One Harsh Critic, published every Sunday night at http://oneharshcritic.gather.com.
You can keep up with Josh's postings and his Gather activity by joining his Gather network. Just click here: http://filmmaker1997.gather.com, and then select the orange "connect" button on the left hand side of the page.
You can find Josh and other Movie Correspondents, celebrity content and connect with other movie buffs at Movies.Gather.com.
rate
bookmark
email
print
link to this page
I liked getting a little background info, but this movie... extremely disappointing.
To me, films like Hannibal Rising are made for commerce only. Everyone has a mortgage (or huge monthly rent payment) hanging over their heads and that's why films like this are always gonna be made.
Time to leave well enough alone I think
-Chas
If you haven't watched Silence of the Lambs... You need to got out and rent it. Its simply a great film, fan of the genre or not. You're right about the rest, but check Silence out.
I'll probably pass on this one, or perhaps rent it when I get bored and am looking for something slashy for a rainy afternoon.
I will agree, Silence of the Lambs movie and book are excellent.
I'm glad I went to the cheapo theater to see this one and I did it alone. So I don't feel robbed. (I'm really the only horror movie addict in the house) Although, I DID get something out of the movie. Some background information on what is one of my alltime favorite bad guys. While it could have been better, I didn't think it was a total waste. There were some scenes that were exciting... especially if you're the ONLY person in a dark theatre. Hahhaa! It was great! It added to the suspense to be vulnerable like that. I kept my keys in my hand to use as a weapon the whole time! hahaha!!